Comments

Cavalcade (1932-33) — 4 Comments

  1. This film is not really my cup of tea.
    That being said, I always appreciate your perspective. I typically read what you’ve written directly before sitting to watch the film because it helps me to adjust my mindset in a way I might not otherwise.
    I actually love the concept of this story and how it covers this huge arch of family’s life and how “life” itself takes a toll and changes everyone involved, all at the turn of the last century. I also appreciate the fact that this “upper” class family ultimately treats their “downstairs” counterparts as a part of the family, with visits and inclusion, never snubbing them on the street.
    And the “downstairs” cast are some of the most engaging and entertaining of the film. I loved these various characters and their portrayals and find myself looking forward to them. The actress, Merle Tottenham, makes her character Annie absolutely bizarre, in an odd ‘I can’t look away’ sense. Also, the two young actors who play the early versions of Edward and Joe are delightful.
    There are many technical aspects that I was quite impressed with. The air raid was remarkably staged. The first montage made me immediately think of “All Quiet On The Western Front”. A great story telling tool. That said, I did feel it went on a bit long. I understood where they were going with it but found myself wishing they had pared it down. A little too much of a good thing.
    On this same note, I found the closing montage a bit jarring. Again, understanding what they were trying to get across, I think this, for me, was simply a technical limitation of the time. The transition into and out of the montage was too abrupt, especially from an audio perspective.
    For my tastes, overall, I found a lot of the film played a little too melodramatically. And, I feel, unnecessarily so. Perhaps it was its stage origins or because so many of the stage cast were involved. I found too many of the choices far too over the top, akin to slapping the back of your wrist to your forehead as you turn your head to the side and inhale deeply. I found myself wondering how I would have enjoyed this had it been cast differently. Which is why I found myself not really enjoying it (although this, my second viewing, was better than the first time around).
    The transfer made me very sad. That a Best Picture winner should be in such poor repair. Understanding that the original negative is long gone and few are clamoring for this title, making a full-on restoration financially foolish, it still leaves me sad that this winner is so unloved.

    • I’m glad you gave it a second chance! Despite the heavy influence on “Upstairs, Downstairs” and “Downton Abbey,” this movie often ranks near the bottom of the Best Picture-winners lists. I think the Academy has made many a worse selection. I agree about the occasional over-the-top acting and the melodrama throughout. Diana Wynyard, in particular, goes from wonderful to terrible, sometimes within the same scene. I still find her very appealing in the role. For whatever reason, it doesn’t bother me as much, because the premise and story are so strong. I would love to see a full remake and update of the material, although with such a broad scope, it couldn’t be done on the cheap.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>