Rebecca (1940)
“Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again.”
Rebecca is one of those films like Casablanca that gets better with additional viewings. I recall feeling frustrated the first time I saw it. I found it difficult even to appreciate Alfred Hitchcock’s masterful direction until the twist came halfway through. Yes, I’ll get into spoilers later, and for those who haven’t seen this 80-year-old masterpiece, I’ll alert you when they’re coming.
Rebecca isn’t a person in the film. She is already deceased, although her presence is everywhere. No, that’s not a spoiler. The film is named after someone who is dead before the story begins. She may have title billing, but the leading lady is actually Joan Fontaine, and, by contrast, her character’s first name is never mentioned or revealed. Based on the classic novel, this Gothic tale is told from her point of view in first-person, therefore she is simply referred to as “I.” Her lack of identity in both the book and movie is intentional. She is a non-entity when we first see her in the opening scenes. A mousy young woman lurking in the shadows of her wealthy employer Mrs. Van Hopper (the marvelously imperious Florence Bates), who has hired her to be a traveling companion in Monte Carlo. Their relationship is akin to Cinderella and her wicked stepmother. When the dashing Maxim de Winter (Laurence Olivier) is invited to join them for coffee in the hotel lobby, he is instantly smitten with the shy waif, and vice-versa. A whirlwind romance ensues on the sly while Mrs. Van Hopper is bedridden with a cold.
We learn from the start that Maxim is a rich widower, and his first wife’s name was Rebecca. She was beautiful and sophisticated, and everyone adored her. What we come to find out about Maxim soon enough is that he is controlling, forward, abrupt, and prone to irrational outbursts of anger for reasons unknown, yet he is clearly enamored. The object of his affection is equally smitten, but “demure” doesn’t begin to summarize her. She is one step away from nonexistent. They both seem drawn to their polar opposites and a desire to escape from themselves. Before long, he proposes even though we know as little about them as they know of each other. She is an orphan who was living with her father until he died just a year ago. Maxim lives alone, minus a fleet of servants, on his family’s immense estate in Cornwall, called Manderley.
The frustration I felt when I first saw this movie stems from the main character’s willingness to go along with everything and everyone despite the warning signs and mistreatment. Upon meeting Manderley’s sinister housekeeper Mrs. Danvers (Judith Anderson in an iconic performance), it is clear this second Mrs. de Winter is in over her head. With subsequent viewings my frustration waned. These early scenes in question have taken on a nightmarish quality I now find brilliant, as if I were witnessing a sleepwalker as she advances right into a dark web of unhappiness and despair. The gnawing feeling of “why don’t you do something or say something?” ends up no more than a silent scream of the subconscious while longing for her to wake up.
Joan Fontaine has a difficult role and handles it beautifully. When this film went into production, she was a mid-level actress at RKO and the younger sister of film star Olivia de Havilland. Fontaine won this coveted part after Hitchcock considered several “bigger names,” including Vivien Leigh, Margaret Sullavan, Loretta Young, and Anne Baxter. Their screen tests are included in the Criterion release on both DVD and Blu-ray, and I must congratulate Hitch and producer David O. Selznick on getting it right. If our nondescript protagonist is too strong or too clever or too confident, she isn’t believable in this story. She also has to be likable enough that we will forgive her naive actions and awkward speech. We have to root for her to find her way.
Fortunately, the heroine does wake up after a big plot twist. Now come the spoilers:
We are led to believe by everyone involved, especially Mrs. Danvers, that Rebecca was the perfect, ideal woman. The scene where Danvers takes the second Mrs. de Winter through Rebecca’s impeccably preserved bedroom and describes every last detail about who Rebecca was and how she lived is particularly creepy and riveting. There’s been much speculation about the motivation of Mrs. Danvers. Was she in love with her former employer? She certainly was obsessed with her. I do believe Danvers is in love with the power Rebecca had over others. The way she dominated a room and controlled Maxim and everyone around her. Danvers despises weakness and submission but worships influence and authority. Our new bride is overwhelmed by it, utterly eclipsed, and the evil housekeeper nearly convinces her to take her own life, because she could never hope to measure up. That’s when a distress signal is heard in the distance. A ship has gone down. We discover from the search party that another, smaller boat was found at the bottom of the sea. It was Rebecca’s, and her body is still in it. When Maxim reunites with his new wife at the boathouse, we learn the truth—that he despised Rebecca. She was a monstrous woman. After they were married, she told him their marriage was a sham. She would play the part of the faithful wife and hostess, but she had no intention of keeping her vows. The night Rebecca died, she told Maxim in the same boathouse that she was pregnant with another man’s child. She challenged him to kill her for the indiscretion. An argument led to a fall, and Rebecca hit her head against a metal anchor. The wound was fatal. Maxim panicked. He dragged her lifeless body into the boat and punctured its hull, so it would sink.
Certain that Rebecca has won even in death, Maxim tells his new wife that he’ll be charged with murder now. It’s the moment we see a shift in Fontaine’s performance. During the next few scenes, she sheds her naiveté and finds inner strength and purpose. She will fight to prove her husband’s innocence.
The other major player in this Gothic yarn is George Sanders as Jack Favell, Rebecca’s former lover and father to her unborn child. Sanders is deliciously slimy as he attempts to blackmail Maxim and shift the outcome to his own favor. He would go on to win an Oscar in another Best Picture ten years later, All About Eve.
Rebecca has grown on me over the years into a riveting mood-piece that crawls under my skin—a tale of obsession and helplessness and mistaken intentions and a struggle for identity. This was Hitchcock’s first Hollywood film after a successful career in England, and he hits it out of the park. It remains his only effort to take the top prize from the Academy, and in a year full of heavy competition, it’s a great choice.
Rebecca
Director | Alfred Hitchcock |
Primary Cast | Laurence Olivier, Joan Fontaine, George Sanders, Judith Anderson, Nigel Bruce, Reginald Denny, C. Aubrey Smith, Gladys Cooper, Florence Bates |
Familiar Faces | none (no repeat performers from the previous winning films) |
Firsts | First film that Alfred Hitchcock made in Hollywood and the only one of his movies to win Best Picture |
Total Wins | 2 (Picture, Cinematography: Black and White) |
Total Nominations | 11 (Picture, Director, Actor: Laurence Olivier, Actress: Joan Fontaine, Supporting Actress: Judith Anderson, Writing: Screenplay, Art Direction: Black and White, Cinematography: Black and White, Editing, Special Effects, Original Score) |
Viewing Format | Blu-ray Disc |
It’s kind of astonishing that this became a movie and a big hit for Hitchcock twelve years before du Maurier’s classic short story, The Birds, was first published. Would Hitchcock have even bothered to make The Birds if Rebecca hadn’t been so successful twenty years earlier?
A great observation, and I’m sure Hitchcock looked closer at the work of du Maurier after the success of “Rebecca.” It might have gone undetected otherwise!
Recently, our book club read Rebecca then watched the movie. I have a couple of thoughts after watching this, again.
I was really irritated with the second Mrs. for not taking some ownership in her new home. Her awakening (I like that description) happened a bit sooner than I recalled with the cleaning out of Rebecca’s office and the party; although, it was rather short lived.
Rebecca, for all of her bravado, was rather a coward when it came to her cancer diagnosis. Selfish to the core, she manipulated someone else to end her life. Good thing she was not pregnant as I think she would have been a terrible mother.
So far, the movies made from books I have read seem to be truer to the actual story than many later movies adapted from books.
Excellent observations, all around. I especially agree with you about Rebecca’s cowardice and selfishness regarding the setup of her own demise. And it’s easy to be turned off by the second Mrs. de Winter, I agree. When I first saw the film, it almost lost me because she seemed so weak and helpless. It was only in future viewings that I got more caught up in her “living nightmare.” Plus, I took comfort knowing that she does “grow a spine” in the end.
Everything that you call out here is exactly how I’ve felt about this film. I’d seen it before and wasn’t all that crazy about it. Some of it seemed really off. I couldn’t make sense of what the attraction was between the two. He seemed overbearing and rude with almost dangerous mood swings. What was the big deal here? And… he didn’t really seem to like her. They’d be having a good time, he’d be a jerk, she would cry, he’d say, “oh, I made you cry” and everything was better. A little disturbing.
Then her mousiness just seemed too much, especially with his clear lack of awareness of it. How it affected her, being thrown into this new life situation. There was no communication between the two of them about it. And, also, that he never knew how bonkers Danvers was.
It took me years to decide to sit and watch it again. In viewing it this time, perhaps I was a little more inclined to view it in its original time period/context. I did enjoy it this time and was much more keen on what these actors were bringing to the table.
I wish I had watched the five auditions prior to seeing the film. Fontaine clearly nails the role in the film. But I wish I didn’t know that before watching the other four. Like I said, I can’t imagine sitting and watching stacks of these auditions trying to make the right choice. She was definitely the right choice of the five they presented.
What a juggling act she has to perform, an incredibly fine line she walks. The likability factor, for sure. Vivian Leigh seemed to be projecting an undercurrent, a subtext of deviousness (like you said, maybe some left over Scarlet). But Fontaine was able to project her insecurity and balance it. I’m still a little frustrated that Maxim doesn’t seem to pick up what’s going on with her. Interesting to hear what Hitchcock’s frustrations were with Olivier’s delivery (too fast, too slow). None of it jumped off the screen for me. I just wish he were written differently.
And Ms. Anderson. I was trying to be more aware of the potential lesbian relationship between her and Rebecca. She states she never pushed it and I agree. She seems to play what’s on the page, which is already in the creep zone. Again, I don’t get why Maxim doesn’t pick up on any of this. So much going on and he’s clueless.
I’m glad I re-watched it though. Well worth some great performances (including Sanders and Bates. Great character work for them both).
Thanks for weighing in, Michael! I agree it’s hard to feel sympathy or empathy for Maxim (Olivier) when he seems so detached and disinterested outside of his mood swings. It could have been worse, had they stuck to the novel’s key plot point with the death of Rebecca being no accident. It was unreleasable as written, under the Hays Code’s thumb. If Maxim had committed murder, even in the heat of the moment, and gotten away with it at the end, the film wouldn’t have been approved for general release. So they actually softened his character a bit for the big screen. Ultimately, I think it’s the nightmarish tone set by Hitchcock that makes this movie so great, which the reason I can buy into the lack of logic in behavior and reactions from many of the characters.