Comments

Rebecca (1940) — 6 Comments

  1. It’s kind of astonishing that this became a movie and a big hit for Hitchcock twelve years before du Maurier’s classic short story, The Birds, was first published. Would Hitchcock have even bothered to make The Birds if Rebecca hadn’t been so successful twenty years earlier?

    • A great observation, and I’m sure Hitchcock looked closer at the work of du Maurier after the success of “Rebecca.” It might have gone undetected otherwise!

  2. Recently, our book club read Rebecca then watched the movie. I have a couple of thoughts after watching this, again.

    I was really irritated with the second Mrs. for not taking some ownership in her new home. Her awakening (I like that description) happened a bit sooner than I recalled with the cleaning out of Rebecca’s office and the party; although, it was rather short lived.

    Rebecca, for all of her bravado, was rather a coward when it came to her cancer diagnosis. Selfish to the core, she manipulated someone else to end her life. Good thing she was not pregnant as I think she would have been a terrible mother.

    So far, the movies made from books I have read seem to be truer to the actual story than many later movies adapted from books.

    • Excellent observations, all around. I especially agree with you about Rebecca’s cowardice and selfishness regarding the setup of her own demise. And it’s easy to be turned off by the second Mrs. de Winter, I agree. When I first saw the film, it almost lost me because she seemed so weak and helpless. It was only in future viewings that I got more caught up in her “living nightmare.” Plus, I took comfort knowing that she does “grow a spine” in the end.

  3. Everything that you call out here is exactly how I’ve felt about this film. I’d seen it before and wasn’t all that crazy about it. Some of it seemed really off. I couldn’t make sense of what the attraction was between the two. He seemed overbearing and rude with almost dangerous mood swings. What was the big deal here? And… he didn’t really seem to like her. They’d be having a good time, he’d be a jerk, she would cry, he’d say, “oh, I made you cry” and everything was better. A little disturbing.

    Then her mousiness just seemed too much, especially with his clear lack of awareness of it. How it affected her, being thrown into this new life situation. There was no communication between the two of them about it. And, also, that he never knew how bonkers Danvers was.

    It took me years to decide to sit and watch it again. In viewing it this time, perhaps I was a little more inclined to view it in its original time period/context. I did enjoy it this time and was much more keen on what these actors were bringing to the table.

    I wish I had watched the five auditions prior to seeing the film. Fontaine clearly nails the role in the film. But I wish I didn’t know that before watching the other four. Like I said, I can’t imagine sitting and watching stacks of these auditions trying to make the right choice. She was definitely the right choice of the five they presented.

    What a juggling act she has to perform, an incredibly fine line she walks. The likability factor, for sure. Vivian Leigh seemed to be projecting an undercurrent, a subtext of deviousness (like you said, maybe some left over Scarlet). But Fontaine was able to project her insecurity and balance it. I’m still a little frustrated that Maxim doesn’t seem to pick up what’s going on with her. Interesting to hear what Hitchcock’s frustrations were with Olivier’s delivery (too fast, too slow). None of it jumped off the screen for me. I just wish he were written differently.

    And Ms. Anderson. I was trying to be more aware of the potential lesbian relationship between her and Rebecca. She states she never pushed it and I agree. She seems to play what’s on the page, which is already in the creep zone. Again, I don’t get why Maxim doesn’t pick up on any of this. So much going on and he’s clueless.

    I’m glad I re-watched it though. Well worth some great performances (including Sanders and Bates. Great character work for them both).

    • Thanks for weighing in, Michael! I agree it’s hard to feel sympathy or empathy for Maxim (Olivier) when he seems so detached and disinterested outside of his mood swings. It could have been worse, had they stuck to the novel’s key plot point with the death of Rebecca being no accident. It was unreleasable as written, under the Hays Code’s thumb. If Maxim had committed murder, even in the heat of the moment, and gotten away with it at the end, the film wouldn’t have been approved for general release. So they actually softened his character a bit for the big screen. Ultimately, I think it’s the nightmarish tone set by Hitchcock that makes this movie so great, which the reason I can buy into the lack of logic in behavior and reactions from many of the characters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>